Chronic Underfunding of Open Source Software Threatens Europe's Digital Sovereignty

Key Takeaways:

I. Europe’s digital sovereignty is undermined by a persistent underfunding of OSS, with critical infrastructure at risk due to misaligned investment and dependency on volunteer maintainers.

II. Reactive cybersecurity spending dominates, yet fails to address the latent risk embedded in Europe’s OSS supply chain, with patching and verification gaps persisting in critical systems.

III. Without indexed, outcome-driven funding models and clear criteria for critical OSS components, Europe’s digital economy faces escalating risk exposure and talent attrition.

Europe’s reliance on open source software (OSS) is foundational—an estimated 96% of codebases in critical infrastructure, from banking platforms to government systems, incorporate open source components. Yet, public and private funding mechanisms have failed to match the economic value and systemic risk OSS now represents. While the European Commission committed over €343 million to digital security and OSS initiatives since 2021, this figure pales beside an annual European IT market exceeding €1.2 trillion and a cybersecurity sector forecasted to reach $351.9 billion globally by 2030. The strategic risk is not theoretical: a single, underfunded OSS vulnerability can trigger cascading failures across sectors, with potential economic losses running into tens of billions—orders of magnitude greater than the current cost of proprietary software licensing. This chronic underinvestment poses a direct threat to Europe’s digital sovereignty, undermining resilience against both cyberattacks and geopolitical pressures.

Invisible Infrastructure, Visible Risk: The Economic Case for OSS Investment

Despite open source software constituting the backbone of Europe’s digital infrastructure—powering over 90% of cloud, data, and IoT platforms—its economic contribution remains largely unquantified in national accounts or strategic investment models. Unlike proprietary software, which is tracked through licensing and procurement budgets, OSS is treated as a cost center rather than a value multiplier, impeding accurate risk modeling and capital allocation. This analytical blind spot undermines policy and investment decisions, as the full economic leverage and exposure created by OSS dependencies remain invisible to both governments and private sector leaders.

The risk profile is not abstract—recent supply chain attacks leveraging OSS vulnerabilities, such as those in Log4j and OpenSSL, have caused direct losses estimated at €10–20 billion globally. Scenario modeling by ENISA and the World Economic Forum suggests that a coordinated attack exploiting a critical OSS library used across energy or financial sectors could result in systemic losses ranging from 0.3% to 1.2% of EU GDP, or €40–160 billion annually. Such figures dwarf proprietary software audit costs and highlight the macroeconomic stakes of chronic OSS underfunding, which exposes Europe to both cyber and geopolitical threats.

While the cybersecurity market is projected to grow to $351.9 billion by 2030, a significant—yet poorly quantified—portion of this expenditure is reactive, focusing on incident response and regulatory compliance rather than on pre-emptive OSS hardening. Industry estimates indicate that less than 15% of European cybersecurity budgets in 2024 are allocated to proactive OSS security measures, leaving critical vulnerabilities unaddressed. This imbalance perpetuates a cycle of high-cost, low-yield spending and fails to incentivize the systemic, upstream investments required to secure foundational OSS components.

Efforts to recalibrate the funding landscape remain nascent. Germany’s Sovereign Tech Fund, with €70 million allocated since 2022, stands as an early model, but represents less than 0.02% of the EU’s annual digital economy. By contrast, the European Commission’s cumulative investment of €343 million in digital security since 2021 is dwarfed by the scale and complexity of OSS dependencies in critical infrastructure. To internalize externalized security costs, mechanisms such as mandatory security audits for high-impact OSS, public–private risk-sharing models, and insurance premium reductions tied to proactive OSS investment must become integral to national and EU-level policy.

Reactive Security, Proactive Failure: The OSS Supply Chain Dilemma

Underfunded OSS projects suffer from extended mean time to patch (MTTP) critical vulnerabilities, with qualitative evidence indicating exploit windows stretching from weeks to several months—far exceeding the industry target of 7–14 days for high-severity flaws. While robust, project-level MTTP data remains a recognized gap, the correlation between resource constraints and patching delays is well established. This lag not only increases the attack surface but also amplifies the risk of coordinated exploitation in critical infrastructure, where patch propagation can be further delayed by fragmented deployment and regulatory bottlenecks.

Policy responses such as Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) mandates are proliferating, yet the lack of automated artifact signature verification and continuous validation renders many SBOMs an exercise in compliance rather than security. While precise European adoption rates are not yet public, industry assessments suggest that fewer than 20% of deployed SBOMs incorporate end-to-end cryptographic validation. This reveals a critical measurement and enforcement gap, as the mere existence of SBOMs does not equate to actionable supply chain security, particularly in complex, multi-layered OSS stacks.

Hardware-rooted trust represents an underleveraged avenue for systemic resilience. The EU Chips Act, committing €40 billion by 2030, provides a unique opportunity to embed security at the silicon level for both proprietary and open source systems. Strategic allocation of these funds toward secure chip design—especially for hardware supporting OSS root-of-trust and secure boot mechanisms—can materially reduce the risk profile of European digital infrastructure. This approach must be harmonized with software-level investments to ensure vertically integrated, verifiable security from chip to cloud.

Despite substantial investment in cybersecurity, the European Commission’s €343 million in digital funding since 2021 has yet to yield a measurable reduction in systemic OSS vulnerability exposure. The absence of standardized metrics for vulnerability remediation velocity, deployment of secure-by-design architectures, and independent code audits perpetuates a cycle of reactive expenditure. To break this cycle, new EU-wide benchmarks for OSS security outcomes, coupled with real-time, transparent reporting, must be established as prerequisites for public and private funding.

Toward Sustainable OSS: Funding Models and Talent Retention for Digital Autonomy

Sustainable funding for OSS must be indexed not only to the growth in digital dependency—measured by the number of critical software packages, lines of code in use, and their sectoral economic value—but also to the evolving threat landscape. A dynamic, multi-year fund should be structured with allocations adjusted annually based on a composite index of OSS dependencies, threat intelligence, and sectoral criticality, ensuring continuous investment in maintenance and security hardening. This approach provides a rational, data-driven foundation for long-term digital autonomy.

Performance-based funding must be underpinned by rigorous, transparent KPIs—such as reductions in unresolved critical CVEs, improvements in project SLSA (Supply Chain Levels for Software Artifacts) attainment, median MTTP reductions, and increased resolution rates for high-severity vulnerabilities. These metrics should be independently audited and tied directly to both ongoing funding and public recognition, creating positive feedback loops for security and resilience. This outcome-driven approach transforms OSS funding from a discretionary expense into a strategic investment in systemic risk reduction.

From Neglect to Leadership: Closing Europe’s OSS Investment Gap

The chronic underfunding of open source software exposes Europe’s digital sovereignty to systemic risk, threatening not only economic competitiveness but the very integrity of critical infrastructure. Quantitative scenario analysis suggests that a major OSS failure could trigger losses ranging from €40 to €160 billion annually—far surpassing the cost of proprietary licensing and exceeding Europe’s cumulative digital investment to date. To avert this outcome, Europe must deploy indexed, outcome-driven funding models, enforce transparent security metrics, and elevate talent retention as a primary measure of resilience. Only by recalibrating its strategic priorities can Europe transform OSS from a latent vulnerability into a sustainable pillar of digital autonomy.

----------

Further Reads

I.

II.

III.